Pro Tips: There is NO “Correct” Casting Style, So Find Your Own


There’s more than one way to achieve the gorgeous cast demonstrated by the late, great instructor Bill Cairns.

The idea that there is a single, “correct” casting motion is one of the great fallacies in fly fishing. Spend enough time at the casting pool at a consumer show, and you’ll see several big-name instructors make the case that their method is better than the rest. Truth is, they’re all wrong. What works for your buddy might not work for you at all. This is not to say that all casting motions are created equal, but anyone who claims that there is one “right” way to move your hand and arm through a casting stroke has not spent a lot of time watching elite casters.

A couple of guys who have studied expert casters are Al Kyte, a professor emeritus of physical education at the University of California at Berkeley, and Gary Moran, who has a PhD in anatomy and kinesiology. In the 1990s, they filmed and studied some of the world’s best casters and noted that there were two factors in play: the substance of a fly cast describes those elements that were common among all the subjects of the study; the style of a fly cast describes the actual casting motion used to achieve the substance. Kyte and Moran noted that there were wide stylistic differences among the casters they studied.

The upshot of these findings is that the specific motion of the hand and arm are not nearly as important as the caster’s ability to master the “essential physics” of the fly cast. Kyte described these essential physics as a series of three straight-line movements that occur before, during, and after a cast:

First, the caster starts a forward casting stroke when the fly line is straightening directly back from his intended target direction. Next, he smoothly accelerates the rod tip and fly line forward along this target direction. Finally, he stops the rod so that the line rolls out over itself along this same path in as narrow a loop as possible, until it straightens again. (“Fly Casting: Substance and Style,” American Angler, March/April 2000)


Both Lefty Kreh and Jerry Siem are elite casters, but their styles could hardly be more different.
Image via fedflyfishers.org

You’ll notice that these scientists don’t tell you how to hold the rod, move your arm, or track the rod tip. That’s because there are myriad methods to achieve these essential physics. When Lefty Kreh opens his body and increases the length of his stroke for a distance cast, he is displaying just one way to achieve this straight-line acceleration. Jerry Siem, rod designer for Sage, achieves the same affect with a more compact motion that brings the rod butt over his shoulder as his body remains square to his target.

What Kyte and Moran found is that, once they’ve learned the basics, most casters “self optimize”—that is, they unconsciously choose those movements that seem to work best for them. Differences in anatomy, size, and strength come into play in this process. For instance, a tall person has a longer lever (the arm and rod) to work with, but a shorter person may compensate with arm speed. If you look at world-champion Steve Rajeff’s physique, you can see that his power enables him to make incredibly long casts with a motion that simply wouldn’t work for a slighter person.

Rather than focus on learning a particular style, casters should focus on the most basic substance of the cast—moving the line along as straight a path as possible. So don’t listen to anyone who tries to make you move your arm a certain way, unless he is trying to help you achieve this straight-line acceleration. As Kyte put it, “As long as your fly line moves and unrolls in a straight line, there is no reason to feel self-conscious about your style.”

Click here to read “FLY CASTING: Substance & Style” by Al Kyte & Gary Moran.

Watch the three pick-up-and-lay-down casts in these videos from the Game Angling Instructors Association to see how three different casters achieve the same thing.

This article first appeared on Midcurrent.com.

11 thoughts on “Pro Tips: There is NO “Correct” Casting Style, So Find Your Own”

  1. I have seen people who can case almost all the way across Lake Michigan with the greatest of ease. I even went to a casting school but could never get my fly or go more than 40, 50 feet out there. I tried different rods, nothing. Thanks for telling me there is no set method. You have no idea how this relieves my problem.

  2. I’ve taught a few friends and I have always told them that everyone cast different , you developed your own method

  3. Despite the numerous good books out there on fly casting, I think you have to develop your own style of casting that works best for you.

  4. I understand the point the author is trying to make, however, it is not true and is potentially critically bad advice for several reasons.

    There are multiple casting styles and it would benefit the angler to learn each and understand which rigs lend themselves to said particular casting styles.

    I will give a quick synopsis of what I am trying to say.

    Lefty’s style of casting is very good for casting heavy lines or trout methods where there is additional weight added to the terminal end: streamers, indicator setups, and dry droppers. (euro methods have an unique stroke of their own)

    The Jerry Siem method is better for dry fly and traditional wet fly methods where pin point accuracy is advantageous.

    It took me some time to realize and incorporate into my fishing the fact that each method has its own unique style of casting. Although indicators and dry droppers take on more of a side arm casting stroke, they are still cast differently; or streamers vs. indicators.

    A good example was when I took a guide trip with Davy Wotton down in Arkansas to learn the traditional wet fly methods. The first he did was put a stop to any sort of casting that resembled the “Kreh” style. The reasons were not because he personally didn’t like it, but because it suits itself to the application.

    I am not a proponent of over complicating fly fishing. I happen to think this is a tragic mistakes preventing the advancement of our sport. However, this is one area where it pays to be diverse and understand why you are doing what you are doing.

    It would take a lot more page real estate to explain everything contained within my comment. If anyone wants to argue about it, or pick my brain as to the impetus of my comments, my email will be provided.

    The mission is to make everyone a better angler and I think this article is well intended, but critically false. (in the sense it is bad advice)

    1. I think you’re making a different argument than the one in the blog post. Kyte and Moran proved pretty conclusively that, as long as you can achieve straight-line acceleration, it doesn’t matter how you achieve it: the fly will go where you want it. That said, once you have become a proficient caster, learning other methods tailored to specific kinds of fly fishing will certainly help. I agree with you, but I think you are talking about a situation farther down the road in the journey to becoming a accomplished fly fisher.

  5. “I agree with you, but I think you are talking about a situation farther down the road in the journey to becoming a accomplished fly fisher.”

    Fair enough. My problem originates from the destructive rigidity that develops from a, “do whatever is comfortable,” mentality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.