Wednesday Wake-Up Call 02.07.18

Welcome to the latest installment of a new feature on the Orvis Fly Fishing blog, the Wednesday Wake-Up Call, a weekly roundup of the most pressing conservation issues important to anglers. Working with our friends at Trout Unlimited, Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, The Everglades Foundation, Captains for Clean Water,, and Conservation Hawks (among others), we’ll make sure you’ve got the information you need to understand the issues and form solid opinions.

If you know of an important issue–whether it’s national or local–that anglers should be paying attention to, comment below, and we’ll check it out!

1. EPA suspends Clean Water Rule

Wild trout depend on clean water to survive.
Photo by Tom Rosenbauer

Last week, we were praising the EPA for reversing course on Pebble Mine, but almost immediately, the agency re-established itself as being on the wrong side of the clean-water issue by announcing that it has finalized a rule that will suspend the 2015 Clean Water Rule for two years. Here’s why anglers should be concerned about this:

Clean Water Rule clarified that federal Clean Water Act protections apply to smaller tributary streams that may flow intermittently. Such headwater streams comprise over 60 percent of all stream miles in America and provide crucial spawning and rearing habitat for salmon, steelhead, and trout.

Protecting our headwaters streams is among the top priorities for lovers of wild trout.

Click here for the full story from the TU blog.

2. Decision on Everglades Reservoir Looms Large

The benefits of a reservoir south of the big lake are pretty clear.
Graphic via the Everglades Foundation

Tomorrow, the South Florida Water Management District Board is expected to announce which of the five proposed plans they prefer for a reservoir south of Lake Okeechobee. Sadly, most Everglades advocates expect the plan chosen to call for a reservoir that’s too small to really be effective. One of the problems is that a larger reservoir requires more land, and some landowners are not willing to sell:

The water management district was charged with approaching willing sellers of land in the Everglades Agricultural Area but have found few takers. Indeed, the sugar farmers who own most of the land have said — repeatedly — they won’t part with it.

An op-ed on makes the case for choosing one of the larger options.

Click here to read the op ed, and Click here to learn more and to make your voice heard.

3. Lawsuit Questions Who Owns Colorado Riverbeds

Colorado anglers may soon be able to get out of the boat.
Photo by Phil Monahan

Anyone who has ever been on a float trip through private land in Colorado has heard the “don’t get out of the boat” rule. Whereas other Western states limit ownership of riverside land to the high-water mark, in the Centennial State, a landowner who owns both sides of the river also owns the riverbed. This means that wading–or even getting out of the boat to pee–is strictly forbidden. But a lawsuit brought by angler Roger Hill against a landowner with whom he has had many run-ins seeks to change things. The stakes are huge:

If Hill wins, the Arkansas River could be open for wade fishing through private land, and the standard could apply to just about every Colorado waterway. 

At issue is a federal doctrine called “navigability for title,” which takes a bit of complaining. Click the link below to bring yourself up to speed.

Click here for the full story from The Denver Post.

2 thoughts on “Wednesday Wake-Up Call 02.07.18”

  1. Being from Missouri that has always recognized public access to waterways I find Colorado’s, Wyomings’s, Utah’s and others laws that the stream bottom is owned by the land owner very hard to swallow. I liken it to the Robinhood days of “you shot the Kings deer”.
    Personally I will drive the extra 10 hours to Montana to spend my money where it’s appriciated.

  2. Agreed, Colorado’s stream access laws are ridiculously stupid. In my view, Mr. Hill is an absolute hero and I wish him nothing but success in his lawsuit. Colorado’s anglers deserve to have the state’s stream access laws defined.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *